Month: March 2014

The Joys of Writing for Screen

It isn’t very often that writers get to play with writing in formats they’re not familiar with. As a young writer who has only just started his Creative Writing course, I have the privilege of discovering what it means to write in these new formats. I’m sure when I’m older I’ll miss this sensation.

Having to adapt is not a bad thing. There have been times when I’ve been writing a short story and have wished that I could just skip the descriptive writing and focus entirely on the dialogue; there have been times when I’ve felt the opposite. This isn’t a major problem as I’ll typically just write a dialogue heavy or overly descriptive story, but now I’ll stop to wonder if I shouldn’t simply write a screenplay instead.

I had to write a script for either stage or screen for my latest piece of coursework. Having only written a stage play once and never having seen a screenplay in my life, this prospect was both alarming and exciting. To begin with I decided to write a stage play, as I already have a small bit of experience in it. After writing two pages, however, I quickly discovered that this particular plot – a quick encounter between a beggar and two politicians rather conspicuously named David and George – had no substance. It was only after I’d written two pages of the play that my brain informed me that there was nowhere to go from here. Being eight pages away from a finished piece of coursework, I turned to screen.

The first thing I did was download Celtx. That program is simply benign. As I mentioned earlier, I’d never even read a screenplay, let alone written one, so I had no idea how to lay one out on paper. After grappling with the UI for about half an hour, I’d gotten the hang of Celtx, and from then on the pages went by a little too fast. When I printed it off, it actually looked like a real screenplay. It was fantastic. Hopefully the content was up to par too.

Perhaps this is just my experience, but writing a screenplay allowed me to focus more on characterisation than in a standard piece of prose. I felt like the text automatically focused on the characters and their nuances within conversation more than any short story ever could. It was an interesting experience to play with stage directions and pay close attention to how a character should say something and what their body language would be like when saying it. I focused on an argument between two characters who had met for the first time in four years, so naturally I had a playground of emotions to explore. We had to include a monologue too, which I naturally turned into a hate-fuelled rant. I loved it. It was liberating, in a way. I do worry that I was a little bit of a control freak with all the stage direction, though.

Maybe it’s just been a little too long since I wrote any good characters in a short story.

Anyway, that’s my take on writing in a different format for the first time. I can’t remember my first time writing short stories as I was too young; I believe I started at the age of six. (I would love to go back and read my first few, but sadly, those are forever lost. What does a six year old even write about? I vaguely remember floating islands.) I was barely a teenager when I began my first attempts at poetry, which I blundered my way through for years until I found a foothold in the climb to not being awful. I suppose this is the first real writing format that I’d been taught about before I even began to attempt it. Maybe that’s what started this entire experience.

The next time I write a new format will probably be the first time I truly throw everything I have into writing a novel. I’ve written chaptered stories before, but I hesitate to call them novels. Minimal effort went into them with no thinking ahead. Let’s call them something different. I’m going to go with… abominations.

Welcome To My Domain

Cue evil laughing.

Sorry. I couldn’t resist.

So today I have some news for you, to do with the blog. If you haven’t already heard me talking about it, then take a little gander at the URL up there. Yup, that fancy, shiny new one. This is the part when you ask me “what was the point?”

This post is mostly justification.

Digital Footprint

From what I’ve heard, it is incredibly important for writers these days to be able to be found online, especially aspiring authors. This is why my full name is in the title of this blog, as it should come up on Google when you type my name. (So far I’m on about page four, although this new domain might have set me back a bit for now.) I’ve heard – and I’m not entirely sure it’s true – that a having a domain such as .com or .net will cause you to leap up the results in Google searches. I get the feeling that .wordpress.com would have me listed as just a profile on a pre-existing website, whereas .net will categorise me under having a website of my own..

Professionalism

I wasn’t joking back in my first post when I said I’m taking this seriously. This is a writing project, and as such should be treated with the effort it deserves. Having my own domain proves that I’m willing to put more time and effort into this; using the free domain provided is too easy.

Motivation

This wasn’t free! I’m not shy in revealing (considering you can find out for yourself) that this is costing me £15 a year. Hardly the most taxing thing in the world, but if I’m spending money on this blog, then I’ll be more likely to stick with it. In theory. And no, I doubt I’ll pay for the WordPress upgrades you can get. They’re like £80 a year. I, ah, think not.

Why .net?

.com was taken. Grumble grumble. The expiry date for kristianrichmond.com was February 25th, so it felt like fate. I spent the entirety of the 25th checking the domain and attempting to register it. And the entirety of the 26th, where the whois was still telling me it should be expired by now. And by the 27th, it had magically been renewed two days before. Mutter mutter grumble. They’re not even using it for anything!

I could have gone with .me or .co, but they cost like an extra $10 (so £6). That’s not too much, sure, but I’m picky; I’ve not seen .me or .co domains being very widely used and I feel like if they’re as rare to everyone else as they are to me, then people might think they’re just one of those cheap naff ones that people use when everything else is taken. There goes your professionalism. If I didn’t care about that, I’d have gone and got a free .tk domain. (Those haven’t worked well for me in the past, though.)

As for .net itself… I’m a network! I… work… on the… net. No? Well I’m not .organised, that’s for sure.

Other Factors

It’s more memorable.

It’s less typing for your beautiful fingers.

It’s nifty to say.

It’s my name! As a website! Squee!

The shorter the URL, the better.

And one more thing; I know that somebody is itching to tell me where I could have gotten this domain name a lot cheaper and how I’m doing everything wrong and wasting my money and oh god the whole world is going to implode because of my tomfoolery. Well, here’s what I know about web hosting in as little as one paragraph:

.

I’m happy to pay for the convenience, if I’m honest. And people will tell me how easy it is and that it isn’t inconvenient, but it’s done now, so oh well!

Hopefully I’ll have a normal blog post coming up about what it’s like to write a screenplay for the very first time. For the meantime, though, I’ve got some serious hoovering to do.

In Defence of Clichés

Anyone who’s been taught anything about writing is told to avoid clichés at all costs. They’re treated like some monstrous disease that will infect your entire work and render it useless if used at all, in any quantity. Personally, I think that’s unfair.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for originality. The biggest fear I have with my writing – besides not succeeding – is ending up writing about another single mother who has a secret tragic past that comes back to haunt her in an explosive turn of events. Or writing about the young man whose father escapes from prison and wants him dead. You know, the typical thriller. Dean Koontz is one of my favourite authors and he has some really great original ideas but some of his books can be a bit like that.

But I digress. I was talking about clichés having a bad reputation. It’s not that I would like to write a story with a million cliché lines in it, it’s just that I’m wary of the formation of a cliché itself. Thinking about this logically, it would seem that every cliché once started off as an original idea or saying. It would be safe to presume that between it being original to it becoming cliché, it would have become popular; so much so that it got worn out. For the idea to become popular it had to be revolutionary, or effective. If this is the case, then perhaps clichés are just ideas or concepts that have gone out of date. Take the shower scene in Pyscho, for instance. What once terrified audiences has now become a roll-your-eyes type scenario.

This worries me. It feels like writers now have too many potholes they have to avoid in order to spare themselves from being cliché. Just how many different ways of phrasing things are there left that won’t flag up this crucial criticism? I mentioned about the almost stereotypical thriller story earlier; how long until tragic pasts become cliché? Are they cliché already? Must writers really avoid telling certain stories simply because they’re too similar to older ones?

Typically, constructive criticism doesn’t frustrate me. It’s useful and helpful, and nowadays is given to me by people far more experienced than myself. But I do feel a slight pang of annoyance when someone points out that one of my characters is being cliché. I wrote that character acting that particular way because it benefits the story, but because that particular aspect has been done before, I have to work around it.

This isn’t supposed to be a whinge. It’s just interesting to me that the concept of the cliché exists, and how it can undermine writers at times. I suppose my concern about this is a variant of the classic fear that writers are going to run out of original stories to tell. Look at soap operas and cheap dramas, and pay attention to how often they repeat storylines with different characters. I’m willing to sacrifice the knowledge that I enjoy Waterloo Road a little too much, if it means I can use it as an example. While I love the show, I have to admit that they repeat the same stories every few seasons, just with different characters. A few examples are the students with terminal illnesses, the personal life of the head-teachers going haywire, and the constant teacher-student misunderstandings that could cost somebody their job (but somehow never does).

I’m not sure this blog post really has a point. Maybe it is a whinge and I’m too proud to realise it. One could say that it makes sense for certain ideas, phrasings and genres to become stale and overdone. I’m sure I’ll disagree vehemently with my stubborn defence of clichés, a few years down the line. Stay tuned for my self-contradiction!